In the Internet Age, paranoia runs rampant. The wealth of self-service medical information available gives the average person incredibly broad abilities to diagnose — and mis-diagnose — illness. Pick any possible symptom, run it through a search engine, and you can convince yourself that you have any number of life-threatening illnesses. You can find a dozen different message boards to confirm your suspicions, and even self-medicate to a large extent thanks to all sorts of half-baked half-expert advice.
All of which makes it terrifying to read medical nonfiction in the Internet Age. One of the effects of reading Awakenings is the realization of just how fragile a normal life can be. One encephalitic infection, and you’re in a state hospital for the rest of your life, unable to do so much as walk across the room or write your own name. Was that a twitch or a tremor? Are my hands shaking because I’m developing Parkinson’s, or have I just had too much coffee? Do I stutter more than I used to? Who will visit me in the hospital?
Of course, that’s not really the story of Awakenings. The stories in Awakenings are about individuals — individuals locked inside the cages of their own bodies for decades, released (if only partially and temporarily) by L-DOPA — and how they do or don’t cope with their imprisonment, release, and re-imprisonment. Some accept it with grace; others cannot. Some remain creative, vibrant humans; others go mad. The stories that Sacks shares are not merely the stories of their illnesses, but of their humanity in the face of their illnesses. They aren’t humans for whom the illness is some foreign body; their illness is their body, and an inseparable part of their humanity. Awakenings, as a chapter in medical history, is very much about the impossibility of treating the disease without treating the person. That will almost certainly be its legacy.
And I suppose modern medical practitioners would do well to keep that in mind in the current world of over-mis-informed “health care consumers”. You have to treat the paranoia along with the symptom, I think. Because while one might go away easily, the other will not.
This one unfortunately goes in the very small category of books that I started but didn’t finish. I gave it a chance — a really good chance, actually. But 500 pages into it, I still just didn’t care. Didn’t care about the story, didn’t care about the characters, didn’t care about the art or the language of the thing. With another 500 pages to go, I pushed it into the library’s return slot.
It’s a Catcher in the Rye sort of story, about a kid who isn’t quite a kid, a who thinks he might become the Messiah. That’s not a bad premise for a book, and it sets up for some interesting character development. But then there isn’t any. Gurion Macabee, the protagonist, is exactly the same on page 500 as he was on page 1. Like Catcher in the Rye, it’s really just a character sketch, but Salinger had the good sense not to make Catcher in the Rye 1000 pages long. After the first 100 pages or so, the character is pretty well sketched. Then you have to do something with him.
It’s not that I’m opposed to long books. Gravity’s Rainbow has always been a favorite, and it’s a whole lot more dense than The Instructions. But it also goes somewhere, has a narrative arc that has layers and depth. It sets up a totally weird story, twists it back around itself, sews in a dozen bizarre characters, and still barely manages to tie the whole thing up at the end. The Instructions doesn’t do that. There’s virtually no story there. It gives us our Holden Caulfield, and then just turns him loose to babble. Some of the babble is mildly interesting, but there just didn’t seem to be any reason to finish reading the book. Life’s short. Into the return slot it goes.
Modern Irish Short Stories
Ben Forkner (ed.)
Modern Irish Short Stories. The low-hanging fruit would be to try to describe what makes these stories essentially Irish, to extol the poetic nature of the Irish temperament, to explain why that poetic nature lends itself to short fiction, etc. That would be the low-hanging fruit. And I like to work, so I’ll not go for the low-hanging fruit, sweet though it may look. Instead I shall speak of “Dante and the Lobster”.
I’ve read Samuel Beckett before, of course — the surreal drama of Waiting for Godot, the minimalist prose of Fizzles. And so I was wholly unprepared for “Dante and the Lobster”. Here was Beckett, just telling a story. A regular story with a beginning, a middle, and an end. The beginning: Belacqua, having finished his morning reading of Dante, makes his lunch of toast and gorgonzola. The middle: he procures a lobster and takes it to his Italian lesson, where it is nearly stolen by the French tutor’s cat. The end: Belacqua is horrified to find that his aunt intends to boil the lobster alive in its own personal inferno. Clever tag line and finis. A fun story, a humorous character sketch, and so much more lucid than anything I would expect from Samuel Beckett. Who knew he was capable of it?
In general, the stories that I enjoyed in this volume were the ones that make light of death, illness, alcoholism, the human condition. Some of the authors have an almost Buddhist-like take on these things: death finds us, like it or not. You can laugh about it or you can cry about it, but it finds us just the same. So why not laugh about it? Why not make light and enjoy the ride? The stories I didn’t like were the ones that take it so godawful seriously. Lovers leave us, family members cheat us, disease takes us, woe is mankind. Well, yeah — they do. But why tell that story? We’ve already lived it a thousand times over. Tell me instead about the toast; tell me about the lobster. Pathos we all experience similarly, but humor is quirky; humor is individual. The sad songs are all sung the same way; it’s the manic ones that bring something new into the world, and those are the ones that I prefer to hear.
How Music Works
Let’s be fair: David Byrne is a musician, not a writer. He’s certainly a thoughtful musician, but a musician just the same. How Music Works is an interesting record of his thoughts on the history, aesthetics, culture and business of music. Absent his body of recorded work, I don’t think it would stand very well on its own as a book. It’s just not very focused. But as a compliment to his body of recorded work, it shares some insight.
Which means that to really get the most out of How Music Works, I had to do some homework. I’m fairly familiar with the Talking Heads catalog, and fairly familiar with Byrne’s collaborations with Brian Eno. But I’d never seen Stop Making Sense, so that necessitated a trip to the library. I didn’t know much of Byrne’s post-Talking-Heads solo work, so I tracked down a bit of that. How Music Works is a whole lot richer for having done the background listening.
Most fascinating to me was his discussion of the co-evolution of music and architecture. Byrne makes a compelling case that one of the major reasons Western European and African music sound so different is because of the spaces in which they were performed. African percussive music is intensely rhythmic. It was (and is) performed primary in outdoor spaces, free of echo, where complex rhythms won’t collide with each other. Bring an African drum ensemble into a Gothic cathedral, and it would be a mess. The space would be too reverberant, sounds would sustain and echo, overlap with one another differently based on volume and frequency. Percussive music turns to cacophony in those kinds of spaces.
So Western European music — and Western European religious music in particular — developed without a strong reliance on complex rhythm. It was written to sound good in cathedrals, which means complex harmony and sustained notes — things that sound good in spaces where sounds are drawn out and echoed. The pipe organ is unique as an instrument built into the very architecture itself. As the architecture guided the music, so the music guided the architecture. Wagner had an opera house built specifically for his pieces to be performed. Byrne draws on these sonic histories to talk about how and why CBGB became the hub of the New York art-punk scene, giving flight to acts like the Talking Heads and the Ramones.
So the book is sort of pseudo-history mixed with ethnography. Pseudo-history because it’s not academically rigorous — citations are few and far between, and it’s more about Byrne’s interpretation and opinion of historical happenstance than it is about the history itself. That’s okay, except the semi-scholarly delivery does as much to show what the book is not as it does to actually tell the story. I think Byrne would have been better served to approach it more as a story teller, and to abandon the historical / ethnographic pretense. His best musical authorship tells its stories by what it doesn’t say, and How Music Works comes across as an uncomfortable semi-academic effort that falls in the gap between exposition and storytelling, and doesn’t do either especially well.
That said, it’s still worth a read. Overlook the clumsy delivery and the stories are there, and they’re interesting. Important, even. I don’t know if I’m much closer to knowing how music works, but it’s full of fodder for new ways of framing the question.
Facilitating Group Learning
After nearly fifteen years in the same job, it’s easy to get lazy. Easy to just pass the time, do things the way they’ve always been done, collect the paycheck. When I teach training classes, the temptation to hand-wave is vast — the course modules are mostly on rails, and I can just show up, deliver the material, and call it a day. In most cases, the expectations of the trainees are fairly low — they’re used to low standards when it comes to training, and if you show up with a decent grasp of the English language, they’re usually happy. It doesn’t take much to do a perfectly adequate job.
Facilitating Group Learning was a good shake-up for me to get me out of my mediocre routine. The first important principle of Lakey’s is treating the group as a group, rather than as a collection of individuals. Lakey calls this group cohesion the “container”. By minding the container, the facilitator makes sure not to lose the people on the margins, and instead make sure to use the people on the margins to enhance the group learning experience.
Another useful take-away is that container-building is not conflict-averse. In fact, a certain degree of conflict is necessary as we acknowledge and confront the differences between the mainstream of the group and its margins. Lakey contends that learning can only happen when we’re outside our comfort zone — that there can be no such thing as comfortable transformation, because the act of transforming presupposes discomfort. The principle applies more readily to the kinds of trainings that Lakey does — things like diversity trainings and direct action training — but I think it applies even to mundane things like computer software training. Someone who is completely comfortable isn’t pushed to acquire new skills. The trick is to allow them to be safe — safe to ask questions, safe to step outside of their comfort zone. Minding the group container increases safety while also elevating discomfort.
While Lakey’s direct education model is really aimed at activist educators, the principles and methods should inform anyone working in group learning settings, whether doing Earth First trainings or teaching Sunday school classes.